Alpine accentor vs Dunnock
The alpine accentor is heavier: 38.6 g against 20.2 g for the dunnock, about 91% more.

Photo: Paco Gómez from Castellón, Spain · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Photo: Åsa Berndtsson · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons
What is the difference between a alpine accentor and a dunnock?
Each point below is worked out from a pair of recorded values.
- The alpine accentor is heavier: 38.6 g against 20.2 g for the dunnock, about 91% more.
- The dunnock is longer-lived: 10.4 years against 7.67 years for the alpine accentor, about 35% longer.
- Both belong to the genus Prunella, so they are close relatives.
- Both are listed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List.
Side by side
| Alpine accentor | Dunnock | |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific name | Prunella collaris | Prunella modularis |
| Family | Prunellidae | Prunellidae |
| Order | Passeriformes | Passeriformes |
| Weight | 38.6 g – 43.9 g | 20.1 g – 20.7 g |
| Length | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Lifespan | 7.67 years | 10.4 years |
| Main food | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Habitat | grassland | forest |
| Conservation status | Least Concern | Least Concern |
| Countries recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded |
A scale drawing needs a recorded length for both animals; only weights are on record for this pair.
Full record: Alpine accentorFull record: DunnockCompare other animals